Tuesday, November 04, 2008

Now For The Bad News

Ok, idealism aside, my practical take is that if Bob Barr can't win, my best hope for minimizing the growth of government at the federal level is for McCain to win.

I feel ill typing that. Going back over a year, John McCain was one of two (Hillary Clinton the other) candidates I felt I could be pursuaded to vote against. But, divided government can be more deliberative, even though they weren't with the bailouts. It can be more restrained, even though they weren't with the bailouts. Sigh.

I fully expect an Obama landslide. That means unfettered Democratic rule. From this, I expect Obama to be a rubber stamp for his party's Congressional leadership, just as George W. Bush was for his. I expect government to expand dramatically, which is the bad news.

The only upside is historical precedent. Any time either the Democrats or Republicans take a majority, they piss off the American people in short order. We saw what Republicans did with their recent majorities. When Bill Clinton was elected in November 1992, he came into a Democratic Congress. The result? They pissed off the American people to the extent that the Republicans stormed back in 1994. Government was restrained at that point as best as has been in my lifetime.

So, there is some potential good news. It would be better if the American people took notice that they are alienated every time one party rule grows government, and went for REAL CHANGE and voted to restrain it, not by switching back and forth between the two parties proven to grow government, but to the one committed to scaling back the growth, the Libertarian Party.

But, since I'm being realistic here and not idealistic, my hope is for a structural repeat of the Clinton era: Dems take over, Dems screw up, divided government rules the day once again.

It's kind of like praying to have your breast bone brokem, because it's better than having your skull caved in.

Now, back to holding my little newborn guy!


varangianguard said...

You are a funny, kinda guy.

In the interest of two Danish acquaintances, I would hope that you would consider Jesper or Lars as first names (I know, Lars is strictly Danish, but it's his name).

varangianguard said...

"isn't" strictly Danish, I meant to say.

Mike Kole said...

Funny enough, with Ame's Danish heritage, we gave Isabel the Danish middle name "Annelise", and we are strongly leaning towards, "Anders" as a middle name for our yet unnamed little guy.

Ame's cousin Jesper was visiting from Copenhagen when Isabel was born. Young guy. He was a little shellshocked by the experience.

Now, if we were going for strict, traditional Danish names, I am told that the only ones to consider are the names of the Kings, Christian or Frederick, although Holger holds a special spot (see Holger Danske), in addition to being Ame's great-grandfather's name... although I'm a little partial to Aage, her grandfather's middle name. :-)


In other good news, evidently Obama doesn't mind telling his baggy pants-underwear showing supporters to pull up their pants!